THE LAST PICTURE BLOG

OCCASIONAL NOTES ON FILM

So. Boyhood. Again. I should temper any further cries of ‘film of the year’ with the caveats that a) I have only seen a small percentage of all the movies released in 2014 to date and b) I am fully aware that every single person reading this has different taste to me and no-one actually, really, truly cares what my film of the year is anyway. In fact the bestowing of the unsought-after ‘Stu’s Film Of The Year’ accolade matters so little that I could in fact pick any film released during 2014 and the exact same number of people would care: Zero. Zilch. Nada. Donut.

Ride Along, then, is without question the film of the year, but Boyhood is currently a very close second.

Richard Linklater’s recent movie has been lavished with so much hyperbolic praise since its appearance at film festivals and its limited release in cinemas during the summer that presumably anyone who watches it for the first time now will experience a degree of disappointment. That’s no surprise, though; praise such as ‘Stu’s Film Of The Year’ is relatively muted when compared to some supposedly reputable sources: The New Yorker, for example, described the experience of watching Boyhood as akin to “having a never-ending, tantric foursome with three beautiful angels while listening to a jam by a celestial in-house band made up of Joplin (vocals), Hendrix (guitar), Bonham (drums) and Entwhistle (bass)”, while here in the UK one reviewer writing for The Times suggested that anyone attempting to make art in any shape or form in future was “wasting my time, their own time and all the time belonging to everyone else, from now until the end of everything”.

Joking aside, some of the proclamations that greeted Boyhood’s arrival in July were pretty bizarre. In particular I found the contradictory suggestion that this film is ‘a new American classic’ somewhat hard to digest, but I can see why the movie has inspired many – myself included – to champion its greatness. And, despite a few faults, Linklater’s film is great: in its scope, in terms of its ambition and also with regard to the length of the project, Boyhood demands your admiration.

Watching it for a second time was certainly something I found to be worthwhile, not least because I enjoyed it again. I also noticed plenty that I’d missed the first time. I hadn’t made the connection that the opening and closing shots of Mason Jr (Ellar Coltrane) staring into space and contemplating the sky are essentially the same, a cinematic summation of Wordsworth’s famous line that the child is the father of the man, albeit filmed in two different locations and twelve years apart. There’s other stuff echoing across the years, too: the early, repeated shots of Mason Jr staring out of the car window towards the friends and step-siblings he is leaving behind, for example, results in his own detachment from the idea of a ‘home’ and his disinterest in personal possessions when he drives off to university. The very first conversation the boy has with Olivia (Patricia Arquette) is about his work ethic, which is brought up again later in his photography class and in his temporary job as a waiter. Then, more obviously, there are the echoes of his interest in graffiti, from childish vandalism of a storm drain to teenage tag-writing in his bedroom. Some lines and visual clues give away future events: for example Mason Jr’s own sister Samantha (Lorelei Linklater) plants a seed of doubt in the mind of his girlfriend Sheena (Zoe Graham) about their future college year with an off-hand comment about the number of good-looking boys in her dormitory. I missed it first time round, and it explains her later actions.

The point of all this is that it all feeds into the consistency across the 12 years depicted. The events shown in Boyhood flow together seamlessly, a kind of visual poetry subtly and not-so-subtly aided by all those other signifiers – games consoles, haircuts, and so on – which reveal that time is passing but some things are staying the same. It also indicates an incredible degree of forward planning by Linklater; I’m not suggesting that he had the full twelve years mapped out at the start of the project, but after watching the film for a second time I have even more appreciation for the smartness of his script. It is incredibly rich in detail.

I mentioned in my first review that the characters are so well-realised it feels like you know them intimately by the end of the movie, as if you were a family friend or relative. Despite covering more than a decade of personal development (both in terms of the adults and the children) it’s easy to forget we only see 160 clipped, distilled minutes of their lives – some events are large and significant, others small but equally revealing. After my second viewing I was more impressed with the impression created of a family as a whole (despite the estrangement of Mason Sr (Ethan Hawke)). Coltrane looks and acts like a product of his mother and father, sharing certain characteristics and physical resemblances with both, although unfortunately I have more reservations now about the casting of Lorelei Linklater; her acting is fine, in my opinion, but she does not physically resemble Hawke or Arquette at all, and it bothered me more the second time.

It’s also a problem for me that the character of Samantha gradually disappears from sight as the film progresses; she seems integral to the first hour and a half but is unfortunately sidelined for the last sixty minutes. Despite the film’s title, as I mentioned previously all four of these characters are important, not just Mason Jr, so it’s a shame that Samantha fades into the background as time passes. Even when she does appear it seems as though she is very much a secondary concern, and all the attention in those scenes is on Mason Jr or Olivia. Her relationship with her father is also under-developed: the last meaningful conversation they share on screen is a deliciously awkward one about her first boyfriend and contraception, which takes place when Samantha is approximately 15 years old.

I did appreciate the fact that the director invests a lot in seemingly minor characters. There’s a middling scene where the teenage Mason Jr and two friends hang out with two older boys who encourage the younger trio to drink and brag about (non-existent) sexual experiences. For two or three minutes this feels like a film about all five of the characters on screen, yet three of them aren’t seen again after this point. Similarly, Olivia’s partners seem incredibly important while on screen, and then suddenly – as in life – they are just (bad) memories. When some characters do re-appear – friends of Olivia or Mason Sr, for example – it feels surprising, as if it’s a twist.

Linklater has created a fresh take on the coming-of-age film that also slots well into his canon of work: there’s the Texas setting, most obviously, but also the little nods to his earlier films that fans will enjoy as well as it being another meditation on the passing of time. My second viewing confirmed that, for me anyway, Richard Linklater has made a great movie here; one that – eventually – will probably replace Ride Along in my affections.

[In case you missed it at the start, my first review of Boyhood is here.]

The Basics:
Directed by: Richard Linklater
Written by: Richard Linklater
Starring: Ellar Coltrane, Lorelei Linklater, Patricia Arquette, Ethan Hawke
Certificate: 15
Running Time: 166 minutes
Year: 2014
Rating: 9.3

19 Responses to “0183 | Boyhood (Second Viewing)”

  1. Nostra

    Ride Along movie of the year? Must try watching it again as I fell asleep twice during it 😉

    I’m in the minority of not praising it although the concept and execution of it is impressive.

    Reply
  2. Writer Loves Movies

    I think I was one of the very few people who was actually a teensy bit disappointed by Boyhood. I absolutely fell in love with the first half of the film and I agree with you that it feels entirely seamless. But I struggled with the film when Mason entered the teenage years – for me it began to feel choppy. I felt there was so much more for us to see but we were limited to seeing the most common (dare I say predictable) aspects of growing up. I can accept that this was, perhaps, the point.

    I had particular issues with Olivia’s final, emotional out-burst. While I feel Linklater tells a vast and important story through his inclusion of all members of the family and their ‘growing up’ even during adulthood (in Olivia’s experience we’re reminded that Mason himself has so much more of life to come, and there’s a sadness in this as well as hope), Olivia’s sidelining in the later episodes of the film made her final scene feel rushed and obvious. All of this is, perhaps, a little harsh – Boyhood is a grand and interesting example of experimental filmmaking – Linklater’s method has much to offer and I applaud it. His film just didn’t entirely live up to my tremendous expectations of it.

    Reply
    • Stu

      Interesting to read your thoughts, thanks very much!
      I think there are fewer films about those early years (where young characters are front and centre and relatively normal!) compared to the teenage years, so I guess those later rite of passage signifiers are much more well known and commonplace in stories, and it must be harder to make something original out of them.
      I half agree and half disagree about the common / predictable aspects of the teenage years being shown here, though. On the one hand there’s the standard stuff like ‘inspirational talk by respected teacher’, the staying out late drinking / taking drugs bit, the clash with the stepfather and so on, but also I think he leaves a lot out of those years that would have been more dramatic – his first kiss, Olivia kicking her third husband out of the house (or simply asking him to leave…it’s not really clear) etc. etc. I can imagine 9 directors out of 10 leaping on all those things and including them but I get the impression Linklater’s preference is to concentrate on the less obvious but more illuminating scenes – e.g. the drive with his dad where he finds out he’s not going to inherit the cool car, the random long-ish chat he has with the girl in the alleyway, the birthday he has with Mason Sr and his new extended family.
      That final Olivia scene … I can understand that someone would feel a sudden lack of purpose and fear for the future after raising kids for 18 years but thought it was a bit of an obvious contrast with Mason Jr’s optimism as he goes off into the wider world himself. I really liked the Olivia character, so it was a shame to see her end with this sad air of resignation and frustration after her third marriage breaks down, but I guess the point is we have no idea what’s going on off camera year after year. To be honest I thought Samantha was the one who was sidelined! Anyway, thanks for the chance to blather on a little more!

      Reply
      • Writer Loves Movies

        No problem Stu 🙂 Some of those scenes you mention – the chat with the girl in the alley and the drive with his dad – are the ones that have stayed with me too. And I completely agree that it’s harder to do something original with the teenage years as they’ve been covered so many times elsewhere. It was a shame about Samantha getting so little time towards the end – it would have been great to get a girl’s perspective too. I’d really like to see this one again actually – it seems like there’s so much more to discover with each viewing.

        Reply
        • Stu

          Definitely! I don’t buy DVDs any more but if I did I think this is one of the three or four from this year that I’d bother getting. I think I’ll probably end up watching it as much as I’ve watched Dazed and Confused in the past.

  3. ckckred

    Nice review. Still need to watch this again, but I definitely was blown away. I agree with you a lot of the minor episodes in the movie felt real, even though, as you said, a lot of characters disappear and reappear.

    Reply
    • Stu

      That’s what I really liked about it – just a series of very minor events, moments and conversations. Well worth a second viewing I think!

      Reply
  4. Todd Benefiel

    Here in my part of the world, it came and went in a matter of minutes, so I still haven’t seen it (once OR twice!). I’ll have to wait for the DVD release…or catch a flight to the UK and see it there.

    Reply
    • Stu

      It was pretty hard to find in the UK, too, although I was lucky in that my multiplex showed it for a week and then my local independent cinema had it for a night a few months later. I think it’ll work just as well on the smaller screen though. Normally it’s the other way around and we’re waiting for films that everyone in the US (well, near enough everyone) has seen. I think we’re finally getting Risky Business and St Elmo’s Fire next month, for example.

      Reply
      • Todd Benefiel

        Ha! I understand Risky Business, but pulling St. Elmo’s Fire out of nowhere to form the second half of your joke was a work of genius! What next…Fast Times at Ridgemont High and Better Off Dead? And speaking of teen comedies, has The Godfather reached your shores yet?

        Reply
        • Stu

          We’ve not had that one yet, but it’s an interesting title. I’m picturing a hapless Steve Martin forced to babysit four unruly children who cause no end of havoc. Close?

        • Todd Benefiel

          If the four children wake up from a slumber party with the severed head of their favorite pony under their blankets, then yes, very close indeed.

        • Stu

          I definitely think you should be a screenwriter or studio exec, if you aren’t already.

  5. ruth

    Hey Stu! Man, I haven’t even seen it once and you’ve seen this twice already. I definitely will be renting this one, I hope I’ll love it as much as you do. Btw, I’ve added you to my blogroll now, finally got a chance to update it 🙂

    Reply
    • Stu

      I bet you’re sick of reading about this one! Hopefully you will enjoy it when it comes out to stream or rent. I know a few people have felt a little underwhelmed after all the praise but I loved it just as much the second time round. Thanks re the blogroll too, much appreciated. You’re already on mine and I pride myself in guaranteeing each and every site listed 0.75 of a visitor on average per year!

      Reply

Get in touch...

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s