0261 | Everyone Says I Love You

everyonesaysiloveyou1This entertaining mid-90s musical comedy was one of the late Roger Ebert’s favourite Woody Allen films. In his review at the time of release Ebert indicated that Everyone Says I Love You might actually be his number one, and although that view was seemingly tempered by a little distance, by 2001 he still considered it among the director’s finest. And, quite honestly, it’s not difficult to see why he thought so highly of it: there’s an easy-going, breezy charm to this upbeat and witty film, which is full of trademark Allen zingers and amusingly-staged song and dance numbers.

Oddly enough, this would sit nicely on a double bill with Wes Anderson’s The Royal Tenenbaums. Allen’s story focuses on a large, wealthy New York family, headed up by Alan Alda’s Bob and Goldie Hawn’s Steffi. They have two daughters – Lane (Gaby Hoffmann) and Laura (Natalie Portman) – and a newly-conservative son called Scott (Lukas Haas), while Steffi also has two more daughters from an earlier marriage to Paris-based Joe (Allen). They are DJ (Natasha Lyonne), who acts as the film’s narrator, and Skylar (Drew Barrymore), who is engaged to preppy lawyer Holden (Edward Norton). The number of family members and associated others at the dinner table means there are plenty of competing voices with much to say, although the loudest and most forceful of all is usually the family’s German maid Frieda (Trude Klein).

As the title indicates, Allen’s primary concern here lies with the loves of these characters, and he chooses to dwell on the mistakes they make or have made in the past. Lane and Laura chase after the same wealthy teenage boy, Skylar temporarily ditches safe bet Holden for a fling with Tim Roth’s newly-freed gangster and DJ, holidaying with her father in Venice, gets engaged to a young man after knowing him for less than a week. Meanwhile Allen’s recently-heartbroken character Joe chases after Von (Julia Roberts), a disgruntled married woman whose private thoughts from her New York therapy sessions are made known to the neurotic writer courting her in Europe.

Many of Allen’s screenplays focus on failing couples, and here more than ever the writer-director-actor seems to be working through the fallout of his own earlier marriages and relationships. ‘In a relationship, it is better to be the leaver than the leavee’ his Joe tells daughter DJ, before Von promptly leaves him, while Allen’s penchant for deprecating self-analysis can also be found in the way that other characters discuss Joe: ‘I’ve been trying since we got divorced to find the right woman for him, somebody to match up with his personality’, says Steffi. ‘I’m beginning to wonder if the world population isn’t too limited.’

The only solid couple in the film appears to be Steffi and Bob, though a syrupy sweet final scene in Paris featuring Steffi and Joe as they share their own regrets at the collapse of their marriage perhaps undermines the state of Steffi’s current union. As the divorced couple dances on the bank of the Seine there’s more than a flicker of their old romance, but it’s offset with an understanding that they’ve both moved on and can take a degree of pleasure from the fact their two daughters turned out well enough. It’s unashamedly schmaltzy, but there’s more than a hint of romantic magic about the setting and Goldie Hawn’s dancing, even if it anticipates Allen’s later unimaginative takes on European cities (Paris and Venice here equals apartments with views of Sacre Coeur, gondolas, etc. etc.). Ack…it’s charming enough and I’m willing to let this one pass without further comment, but I really don’t care for Allen’s simplistic, one-note take on Europe.

Linking the three cities together is DJ, who visits her father while he is himself holidaying / recovering from an earlier break-up in Venice. Lyonne is an actress I’ve always liked, ever since her supporting role in American Pie, and here she’s a valuable connection, although at times her voice-over is clearly being read from a sheet of paper or an autocue, and the actress also suffers at the hands of some of Allen’s writing (let’s just say he’s more successful at writing neurotic, male, Jewish New Yorkers of a certain age than he is at writing the innermost thoughts of teenage girls).

The film is at its most entertaining – and often bewitching – during the song and dance numbers, which pay homage to old musicals and incorporate jazz standards like Makin’ WhoopeeLooking At You and My Baby Just Cares For Me. The actors aren’t natural performers, either when singing or dancing, but I had a smile on my face whenever anyone broke into song or started tapping their fee. Some are clearly more competent than others: Goldie Hawn and Alan Alda can sing, but Drew Barrymore’s voice was apparently so bad a stand-in (Olivia Hayman) had to be used, while Edward Norton looks utterly uncomfortable throughout (top marks for effort, though, as he gamely soldiers on regardless). The choreography is often as loose as the singing, but it’s all suffused with such energy and frivolity that any amateurish moments can be easily overlooked, and you’re probably going to be too busy chuckling to notice anyway: the film’s tongue-in-cheek routines are increasingly, amusingly surreal, and include such sights as a man in a straightjacket pirouetting through the air, ghosts shaking away to Carl Sigman and Herb Magidson’s ode to carpe-ing the diem Enjoy Yourself (It’s Later than You Think) and a rendition of Hooray For Captain Spaulding in French, performed by a chorus of Groucho Marxes.

If it wasn’t obvious beforehand, the appearance of several people dressed as Groucho at the end of the film indicates that Everyone Says I Love You is, at heart, a celebration of Allen’s favourite things: sardonic wit, classic songs, the Upper East Side, Paris, Venice, musicals from the Kelly / Astaire / Rogers era, and so on. The story may be a little feeble and the performances may be largely unmemorable, but that doesn’t matter too much; a musical comedy stands or falls by its music, its dancing and its humour, and generally Allen and co get it right. There’s a strong sense of the writer’s passion for a certain skewed vein of American culture here, and while it’s hard not to roll your eyes at the appearance of yet another collection of Allen’s smug, wealthy New Yorkers, it’s even harder to resist the film’s goofy charms.

Directed by: Woody Allen.
Written by: Woody Allen.
Starring: Natasha Lyonne, Goldie Hawn, Woody Allen, Alan Alda, Julia Roberts, Drew Barrymore, Edward Norton, Tim Roth, Natalie Portman, Gaby Hoffmann, Lukas Haas.
Cinematography: Carlo DiPalma.
Editing: Susan E. Morse.
Music: Dick Hyman, Various.
Certificate: 12.
Running Time: 96 minutes.
Year: 1996.
Rating: 6.9

Comments 17

  1. The Vern April 2, 2015

    Great review. I really enjoyed this movie and found it to be a lot of fun. I agree that this would be a great double bill with The Royal Tennebaums. Favorite moment is when everybody is singing their version of “Im Through with Love” and then it cuts to DJ’s new boyfriend doing a rap version. That makes me laugh everytime.

    • Stu April 2, 2015

      Thanks Vern. That’s a really funny bit, a great little throwaway moment, but there are lots of them in here! My favourite bit was Allen blowing on Julia Roberts’ shoulders. I was close to tears!

  2. ruth April 4, 2015

    No doubt the scenery is gorgeous, esp in Venice, but for some reason I haven’t mustered enough interest in seeing this. I always think that I prefer a Woody Allen film that doesn’t have Woody in it 🙂

  3. Tom April 6, 2015

    I’ve oscillated between really digging Woody Allen (Midnight in Paris; To Rome with Love) and being downright annoyed by him (his presence in Fading Gigolo was irksome to say the least, and I really didn’t enjoy Blue Jasmine much). I utterly respect his prolific filmmaking though, and by the sounds of this, this might very well settle in a good spot for me. Truth be told I’ve never even heard of this — but that’s probably due to his long, long list of films he’s made!

      • Stu April 7, 2015

        I guess his workrate is the main reason why the films are so hit and miss. I actually liked Blue Jasmine but there are other recent ones that I’ve been fairly non-plussed by, like Vicky Cristina Barcelona and To Rome With Love (I guess our Allen tastes must be inverted!). I didn’t think I’d be into this one at all as I don’t really like musicals, but it’s got a great sense of fun and I thought it was likably offbeat and silly. Fairly disposable though.

        Watching Norton in this is funny; he doesn’t look at all confident or sure of himself, but he gives it a go and his song and dance routine in a jewellery store had me grinning away.

        • Tom April 7, 2015

          I think quite a few would share in the dislike of To Rome, I found it pretty enjoyable but then again that was actually one of my first forays into Woody Allen’s massive collection. Annie Hall might be where I go next. That one sounds like a classic.

        • Stu April 7, 2015

          Oh man Annie Hall is really good! I’m a latecomer to Allen too…I saw a few here and there in my teens and early 20s but only really started ploughing through his back catalogue a few years back. I’ve been doing about 4 or 5 a year but it’s good to have breaks of a couple of months at least!!! If you’ve never seen Manhattan that’s well worth your time too, but in all honesty there are loads of well-regarded Allen films that I haven’t seen yet.

        • Tom April 7, 2015

          Cool. I’ve heard many a compliment paid to The Purple Rose of Cairo as well. Plus that title really intrigues me.

        • Stu April 8, 2015

          That’s one I did see years and years ago, but I don’t remember much about it so ought to re-watch. A very cool title indeed! Cheers Tom.

  4. Todd Benefiel April 30, 2015

    I’ve been a fan of Woody’s work for years (especially The Purple Rose of Cairo, which I highly recommend to you and Tom), but I never wanted to see this one, I think because I’d heard of the singing and dancing involved, which turned me off to it immediately. But if I ever find it to rent somewhere, I’ll give it a go…but only because your review made it sound digestible. Again, our refund policy will be in affect.

    • Stu April 30, 2015

      I’ll stake what’s left of my tattered reputation on the quality of this film! I really didn’t think I’d enjoy it because of the same reasons you mention, but I found myself smiling away throughout. That said I remember now that I was thinking about donuts a lot that week.

      • Todd Benefiel May 1, 2015

        Tattered? No way! Tarnished? Ehhhhh maybe. Anyway, if I can find a freaking library around here, and they carry this film, I’ll give it a rent. But only if you change the name of this site to ‘Donut Nights’.

        • Stu May 1, 2015

          Donut Nights has a bit of a ring to it, but if I ever change the name it’ll be changed to “The Adventures of Buckaroo Benefiel Across the United States”.

Get in touch...

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s