0304 | Kajaki: The True Story

Kajaki-1Paul Katis’s Kajaki: The True Story is a gripping account of real life events that took place in Afghanistan in 2006, and seems to me to be a thoroughly modern war film, both in terms of its portrayal of British soldiers and the day-long situation that they unwittingly find themselves in. Set near the Kajaki Dam, a place that is symbolic of Afghanistan’s recent relationship with the wider world, the story concentrates on a squadron of soldiers from the British Army’s 3rd Battalion, Parachute Regiment who find themselves trapped in a wadi minefield and unable to negotiate a path to safety or evacuation. There are no firefights in this film, just ordinary men trying to cope with the situation they find themselves in, and as a result the acts of heroism we see are vastly different to your standard war film.

Kajaki opens with a half-hour that seeks to establish several characters and explore their station. Their task is to man strategically-placed lookout posts and, presumably, guard the dam and several minor roads around it; we also see them providing information for airstrikes. Unfortunately it’s difficult to work out who is who, at first, but a few men begin to stand out from the pack: Lance Corporal Paul ‘Tug’ Hartley (played by Mark Stanley, previously seen as Grenn in TV’s Game Of Thrones), Corporal Mark Wright (David Elliot), Sgt Stu Pearson (Scott Kyle) and Lance Corporal Stu Hale (Benjamin O’Mahony), the first soldier present to stand on one of the mines in real life, which happened when his patrol went to investigate a roadblock. There were several others involved in 2006 and as such many other characters appear in Kajaki, but those four have been singled out as Katis tends to focus on them.

The film is particularly successful when slowly revealing the extent of the danger faced by the soldiers. When a second mine goes off it becomes clear that each step could be the last one ever taken, and as such no-one caught in the minefield is able to move, whether injured or not. At one point an attempted helicopter rescue sets off a third landmine, and the extreme heat and desperate need for medical care begins to make matters even worse. It’s fascinating to see how the men react in these extreme circumstances: Wright and others courageously enter the minefield to try and help wounded colleagues. Medic Stanley, at one point, unselfishly attempts to reach fellow soldiers by using his backpack to test for mines: he throws it repeatedly and forcefully onto the ground in front of him and, providing it doesn’t explode, subsequently jumps on top of it to move across the wadi. Yet such acts of bravery are mixed with lashes of gallows humour as the soldiers attempt to lift each other’s spirits, despite the fact that some are near-death.

There is little offered in the way of context. Subsequent real-life investigations into the events, which highlighted some wider military failings, are not covered here, although there are brief updates about those involved during the end credits. Additionally, anyone hoping for comment on the UK-US occupation of Afghanistan will be disappointed: Afghan people barely appear in the film, and when they do they are usually distant figures on the horizon. However by concentrating on one single situation, and on one perspective, Katis has crafted a similar kind of ‘ground level’ picture to Kathryn Bigelow’s The Hurt Locker, albeit clearly working with a lower budget and less of a desire to milk the tension for the sake of multiplex thrills back home. This stripped-back, realistic film is just as gripping and, despite the open landscape we see, it is also remarkably claustrophobic.

Directed by: Paul Katis.
Written by: Tom Williams.
Starring: Mark Stanley, David Elliot, Scott Kyle, Benjamin O’Mahony.
Cinematography: Chris Goodger.
Editing: Brin.
Certificate: 15.
Running Time: 108 minutes.
Year: 2014.

Comments 12

  1. Consumed by Film June 17, 2015

    Sounds really interesting. I’m intrigued by the possibility of a film set in a wartime environment and involving soldiers that doesn’t necessarily get bogged down in moral debate. Top work Stu!


    • Stu June 18, 2015

      Thanks Adam. I guess there’s an argument that, over time, there will be more and more films that look at Afghanistan from a British or American perspective (like the two Iraq wars), which might be problematic, but at the moment there are so few films about this conflict I can overlook that. It definitely seems ‘true’ in its portrayal of soldiers…not that I have ever been one!

      • Consumed by Film June 18, 2015

        Yeah, that’s one of the issues I had with American Sniper. Granted, when you go into a film called ‘American Sniper’ expected anything other than a war story from an American sniper’s perspective, you’re probably missing the point.

  2. Tom June 18, 2015

    Fantastic! This is news to me, but I must see this. Love films like this, films that place us alongside the soldiers in situations most of us will never ever be able to identify with.

      • Tom June 19, 2015

        Focusing a war film on something ‘smaller’ like this is what I love about some of the genre’s best. It’s what made me such a fan of this year’s ’71. Following around that poor young soldier in the midst of this bigger situation really made it one of the most powerful stories of the year in my book.

        • Stu June 19, 2015

          I definitely agree…that’s a really good film. Even more tense than this one on balance.

Leave a Reply to Stu Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s