0356 | Me And Earl And The Dying Girl

landscape-1434576906-elm070115intel3-4-002I haven’t seen the two ‘other’ cancer-stricken teenager films of recent years, in which Shailene Woodley and Mia Wasikowska play the victims – why is it usually teenage women? – but I imagine certain scenes found in Alfonso Gomez-Rejon’s Sundance hit Me And Earl And The Dying Girl also crop up in Josh Boone’s The Fault In Our Stars and Gus Van Sant’s Restless. Here the ill patient is Rachel Kushner, played with aplomb by Olivia Cooke, while the ‘Me’ of the title and the primary subject is awkward, creative schoolmate Greg Gaines (Thomas Mann), a senior in a Pittsburgh high school who is forced to visit Rachel by his mother (Connie Britton) when she tests positive for leukemia. As the title suggests Greg is our narrator, and the opening reveals that he is looking back on the months after Rachel’s diagnosis; he occasionally addresses viewers directly via a mannered voiceover, while Earl (Ronald Cyler II) is Greg’s best friend.

The relationship between the two boys is established first. The pair have been friends for years, sharing a love of arthouse cinema that seems to have been inherited from Greg’s father (Nick Offerman), and have even made 42 lo-fi ‘spoof’ films together, tackling anything and everything from David Lynch’s Blue Velvet to Les Blank’s Burden Of Dreams with a roll of gaffer tape, a pair of scissors and a whole load of infectious enthusiasm (and though there are certainly similarities to this 4ed34e7d-4921-418f-a1b1-a0abbe684b14-1020x612month’s The Wolfpack, or Michel Gondry’s Be Kind Rewind, Greg and Earl’s cutesy Kookywood flicks reminded me more of the elaborate stage shows of Wes Anderson’s Rushmore). Their DIY creations are never shown to anybody, though, mainly due to Greg’s vague embarrassment about the finished results, while his and Earl’s shared social reticence also sees them eschew the exaggerated, tribe-heavy corridors and canteens of their high school for the sanctuary of the office of overly-cool teacher Mr McCarthy (Jon Bernthal), where they are able to watch documentaries about Werner Herzog and Powell & Pressburger in peace.

This cinephile-pleasing set-up is awkwardly thrust upon the audience, but spotting the various movie references in Earl and Greg’s work (and beyond) can be fun, and their ramshackle attempts at making a documentary for Rachel before she dies are mostly charming (especially when Earl holds a grey sheet behind Rachel’s slightly-predatory single mom Denise (Molly Shannon) while she is MeandEarlandtheDyingGirl_article_story_largeinterviewed, which he fails to keep still). Me And Earl And The Dying Girl definitely tends toward the twee, but the tone is something that I gradually warmed to, and it makes for an interesting contrast with the increasing number of serious scenes featuring Greg and Rachel as her condition worsens. It’s a movie that tries way too hard, though, a work that yelps ‘Like me! I’m wacky!’ in the same way as (500) Days Of Summer and Garden State before it. It bothered me to begin with, and although I did relax as Gomez-Rejon’s film moved into its second hour I still felt unable to fully embrace it, while the attempt to add some colour to Greg’s world by making every single character stand out for being quirky in some way or other feels like a mis-step by writer Jesse Andrews (adapting his book of the same name).

That all said, when Me And Earl And The Dying Girl returns to the subject of The Dying Girl it’s periodically both mature and moving, even if it’s a little perplexing that Rachel’s pre-Greg friends never seem to visit her and even though there’s too much convenient plotting during the prom night denouement. The screenplay is occasionally and briefly insightful on the subject of grief, though sadly more time is spent concentrating on the comic possibilities of the characters as opposed to the way in which they approach an upcoming tragedy. Thus we see way more of Rachel’s mother’s vaguely-comic Mrs Robinson-style mannerisms than the innermost thoughts of a woman who is about to lose her only daughter, and I’d have been happy to see more of the ideas and themes around death that are explored most obviously during the final ten minutes. Greg’s voiceover knowingly dispenses with any notion of romance with Rachel early on, yet he is revealed to be an unreliable verbal guide and the bittersweet ending is all the better for it. It may make more cynical viewers roll their eyes, but I was moved, and despite cringing on occasion I enjoyed this sweet and well-meaning coming-of-age dramedy (and Brian Eno’s score).

Directed by: Alfonso Gomez-Rejon.
Written by: Jesse Andrews. Based on Me And Earl And The Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews.
Starring: Thomas Mann, Olivia Cooke, Ronald Cyler II, Jon Bernthal, Nick Offerman, Connie Britton, Molly Shannon.
Cinematography: Chung-hoon Chung.
Editing: David Trachtenberg.
Music: Brian Eno, Nico Muhly.
Certificate: 12A.
Running Time: 105 minutes.
Year: 2015.

Comments 12

  1. Tom September 15, 2015

    Fab review sir. I could probably afford to go back and watch this again, as I gave it a very high rating and never seemed to catch how twee the movie apparently came off to the majority of those who have seen it and wrote about it. Not to say that I *have* to be in agreement on every point, but it blows my mind that I didn’t really pick up on it at all. Hahah.

    I personally found it a great one because Thomas Mann really redeemed himself in my eyes after I had seen him in the abysmal Project X.

    • Stu September 15, 2015

      Cheers Tom. You’re still not selling Project X to me!!! I have to admit that I read two or three reviews of MAEATDG that mentioned the tweeness of the title cards and the voiceover and so on before I saw the film, so I was certainly looking out for it. Had I seen the film without reading or hearing anything about it before I may have felt different. I can’t remember when that was last the case, but I miss the days when I went into the cinema knowing little or nothing about what I was about to watch!

      • Tom September 15, 2015

        Me too, it seems impossible now with the way media is 24/7 pounding us over the head with promos, teasers and trailers (which now average between 2.5 and 3 minutes long!). I always like going in blind (or as blind as possible).

        Sorry for keep bringing up Project X, I only just realized that haha. Idk why it keeps popping up in my comments. Guess I’ll never shake myself of it. 😉

        • Stu September 16, 2015

          I suppose it doesn’t help when you’re blogging (or rather reading other people’s blogs) as you’re bound to pick info up by osmosis. Ah well. A necessary danger!

  2. Writer Loves Movies September 15, 2015

    Nice review Stu. I definitely preferred this to The Fault In Our Stars which worked so hard to make its audience cry. Even with the twee, Wes Anderson-esque styling this one felt so much more natural to me. I though it had some neat things to say about the high-school experience too which helped to keep it grounded.

    • Stu September 15, 2015

      Cheers Natalie. I liked quite a lot of the high school-set material too – I liked the idea of the canteen as this cartoonish melting pot of gangs and types, and also the idea of Greg getting through it by being invisible/pleasant to everyone. I haven’t seen The Fault In Our Stars but will probably catch it eventually.

      • Writer Loves Movies September 15, 2015

        There are good things about The Fault In Our Stars but I just felt very manipulated by it. And the Anne Frank scene (you might have heard about it but I won’t spoil it if you haven’t) went a bit too far for me. As always I’m interested to hear what you think when you do eventually see it.

  3. Todd Benefiel September 20, 2015

    In one of your other review’s comments, you mentioned to me that you’d seen 60 new films this year; I, on the other hand, have seen exactly 4, and believe it or not, this was one of them. There are so many points you bring up that I agree with (though I had to look up what the hell ‘twee’ meant!), but for me our standout agreements were the – ahem – twee ‘(500) Days of Summer’ moments early in the film, that I didn’t like much, and the more dramatic and serious second half of the film, which I liked much, much more. It’s too bad the entire movie couldn’t have followed that second-half tone.

    And it’s nice that, every 40th review or so of yours, I can actually say hey, I’ve seen that one, and comment like I know what I’m talking about.

    • Stu September 21, 2015

      There was bound to be some overlap eventually! Glad you enjoyed this one (or at least the majority of it). I think it surprised a lot of people by being a better film than it looks like on paper, if that makes sense. I was also a fan of (500) Days Of Summer overall, even though elements of it had the same effect on me as fingernails scraping along a blackboard.

Leave a Reply to Stu Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s