0423 | The Gambler

I haven’t seen the original 1974 version of The Gambler, starring James Caan, but I gather it is supposed to be much better than this remake directed by Rupert Wyatt. There are several problems with the newer version, but the overall package is inoffensive, and it’s the kind of film that’s ready made for one of those nights when you don’t want to think too much. It plays out exactly how you expect a movie starring Mark Wahlberg as a degenerate gambler to play out: his character, Jim Bennett, is reckless with other people’s money, makes decisions that put his nearest and dearest at risk, is very rude to dealers in casinos and generally acts like a spoilt, ignorant brat, but because this is (a) Mark Wahlberg and (b) a Hollywood movie Bennett ends up redeemed and rewarded in numerous ways before the end credits roll and who really cares about anyone else anyway?

The character’s sociopathic behaviour is apparently born of frustration. He has issues with his parents, for starters, though the screenplay by William Monahan only pays lip service to the mental anguish: his dad upped and left many years before and his relationship with his mother, played by Jessica Lange, is strained to breaking point. Also it’s possible he behaves like this because he may or may not be a tortured genius who is currently stuck in an unfulfilling job: when he’s not placing huge bets at the blackjack table Bennett is a writer and, rather implausibly, a showman masquerading as a literature professor. He treats his lectures as if they’re a cross between an hour of therapy and the kind of stand-up performance that used to be delivered by Bill Hicks, though in no way are the scenes in question as good as that sounds. Let me think it over. Yeah: it’s actually more like watching someone attempt simultaneous impressions of Tom Cruise’s Frank TJ Mackey from Magnolia and Robin Williams’ John Keating in Dead Poets Society. But again nowhere near as good as that sounds.

It’s all pretty standard: filmmakers know that scenes featuring people gambling offer instant dramatic tension, and there are plenty here, with stacks of cash and, eventually, life or death consequences at stake. You’ve seen it all before: a7477db770d410bc28d6836cc0a32270f202f926lingering shots of the roulette wheel as it comes to a halt, the right cards being flipped over at the right time, the broken man staggering out of the casino at dawn, etc. etc. Bennett’s self-destructive streak means he is in too deep, and he runs up huge debts with three people played by Michael K. Williams, John Goodman and Alvin Ing – who will kill him if he doesn’t pay up in seven days. Monahan gets a little tied up with all the financial comings and goings, and it’s hard to follow the amounts Bennett has paid and the amounts he still owes at times, but conveniently all three debtors want their money on the same day, which simplifies the plot even if it is unlikely.

Bennett has lost his mojo at his place of employment, too, but he does take an interest in a few students: Anthony Kelley and Emory Cohen both play kids on sports scholarships with little or no academic aptitude, while Brie Larson is the star pupil who conveniently also works in a high roller casino frequented by Wahlberg’s Jim. Larson’s is a thankless task, given that it’s a one-dimensional ‘love interest’ role, and I don’t understand what her character sees in Wahlberg’s, unless for some reason she’s convinced that the dark suit he sports throughout turns him into a mystery. Their affair is certainly lacking in romantic chemistry, and I wonder whether Wyatt knew this when deciding upon his ending, which keeps the pair apart and cuts to black just before they meet. Elsewhere Goodman and Lange stand out, partly because they both get to deliver expletive-laden monologues, though sadly they only appear in a few scenes.

In truth The Gambler does very little for me, but it’s paced well and as I’ve already said it’s the kind of film that can be used to kill a couple of hours if there’s nothing else on or at hand (though when is that ever the case in this day and age?). It does at least make me appreciate the other gambling film of note that came out earlier this year, Mississippi Grind, even more than I did at the time of release. Grind didn’t exactly re-invent the wheel, either, but its characters are far more intriguing and its road trip was much more fun to watch than Bennett’s flouncy, over-the-top, pretentious lecture theatre schtick.

Directed by: Rupert Wyatt.
Written by: William Monahan. Based on The Gambler by James Toback.
Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Brie Larson, Jessica Lange, Michael K. Williams, John Goodman, Emory Cohen, Anthony Kelley, Alvin Ing.
Cinematography: Greig Fraser.
Editing: Pete Beaudreau.
Jon Brion, Theo Green.
Running Time:
111 minutes.

Comments 6

  1. Tom December 10, 2015

    Yeah it was a pity this was kind of a drag. As much as I like Wahlberg (I like him more than many seem to right now, esp after that whole trip down Transformers Avenue) he just doesn’t really pull off the whole degenerate gambler part that well. And the chemistry btw he and Brie Larson was strangely lacking. Esp given how Larson can really turn anything into a great thing.

    • Stu December 10, 2015

      I have ups and downs with Wahlberg, which isn’t surprising as he can be pretty good in good films (The Departed, The Fighter, etc. etc.) and then pretty bad in bad films. This is definitely veering towards the latter for me, though it’s watchable enough. I agree about Larson’s character – she is so underwritten here. It’s a real shame but it’s one of those classic ‘love interest to the main male star with a couple of token bits of information about her past thrown in’ characters. Cheers Tom!

    • Stu December 10, 2015

      Poor old John! Why is that Cindy? I completely agree about Wahlberg, I’m never sure what I’m going to get with him. Theoretically that should make him more interesting, but in reality that’s not the case.

      • Cindy Bruchman December 10, 2015

        John–I don’t know; his acting is as tiring as his face. I liked him a several roles, but I don’t think he adds to a picture much — he just seems ridiculous or boring rather than eccentric or interesting (Inside Llewyn Davis, Monuments Men, Argo, Flight) Just me. I’m also very tired of Samuel Jackson.

        • Stu December 11, 2015

          His role here is kinda similar to Inside Llewyn Davis…not in it for long, makes his presence felt, etc. I saw him on stage in London earlier this year with Damien Lewis in a David Mamet play; I like him but it was a little disappointing all round.

Get in touch...

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s