0591 | Aliens

As the years go by I find it harder and harder to muster the same levels of enthusiasm for certain films that I used to have, particularly with regard to those that I watched repeatedly during my teenage and student years. James Cameron’s Aliens is one of them: I still like it, but the fact is I’ve probably seen it at least half a dozen times over the years, and so familiarity has lessened the film’s impact considerably. However, I’d never had the chance to see it on the big screen until last week; to coincide with the 30th anniversary of its release, London’s Prince Charles Cinema has recently been showing Aliens in 70mm to packed audiences, so it seemed like a good opportunity to check it out one last time. After this I doubt I’ll watch it again … life’s too short and there’s so much more I’d rather spend my time seeing. Like…er…Ghostbusters reboots and Now You See Me sequels.

I wouldn’t say that the experience has changed my opinion on the film in any way, but for what it’s worth I enjoyed it and still think Aliens stands up today as being one of the high watermarks of 1980’s action or science fiction movies. After all, primarily thanks to Cameron’s adept handling of tense, bullet-heavy sequences – and his raging hard-on for military grade hardware – Aliens is still great fun to watch, even though the more downbeat moments within the film are occasionally a little rough around the edges. Some of the acting by those playing marines, for example, is decidedly ropey, although it’s true that the biggest culprit – Bill Paxton –  manages to turn a largely forgettable character into a memorable one thanks to his enjoyably over-the-top surf dude performance; his ‘Game over, maaaaaan, game over!’ is the film’s second most quoted line after Sigourney Weaver’s ‘Get away from her, you bitch!’, and both predictably drew applause and cheers during the screening. Similarly amusing is Al Matthews as the cigar-chomping, wide-eyed Sergeant Apone, a character who lights up within two seconds of waking up from stasis and who sadly bites the big one far too soon, though it does at least save the audience from any more overacting. Then there’s Jenette Goldstein (Vasquez) and Michael Biehn (Hicks), both delivering stellar performances while they’re running around, shouting and shooting at aliens, but both showing their limitations each time they’re required to slow down and talk things through with Weaver’s Ripley. Still, as we all know there are some really strong performances here alongside the more colourful and cartoonish ones: Lance Henriksen is pretty good in his brief scenes as the android Bishop and Paul Reiser makes a decent fist of the slimy and self-centred corporate suit Burke. But this is Weaver’s film, and she is superb (again) as Ripley, the lone survivor from the first story who must conquer her nightmares by returning to the scene of earlier devestation. She picked up an Oscar nomination for her performance, and rightly so; what’s more – even though she eventually lost out to Children Of A Lesser God‘s Marlee Matlin – it was received during an era when the Academy still sniffed haughtily at all things sci-fi.

They were fine in 1986, but some of the effects have understandably dated, although it must be said that the actual alien effects hold up just fine and all the elements surrounding the creatures in their slimy lair still look great today. With the notable exception of the aliens themselves the special effects were always of less importance to this mood-heavy franchise than a lot of other sci-fi of the era anyway; I personally think that you remember the Alien films because of the look of the monsters as well as the dirty, dingy, industrial production design, rather than the quality of the shots of spaceships flying through the sky. Cameron continued with Scott’s ‘truckers in space’ motif for his sequel, and once again everything’s battered and used and feels like it’s about to break down. And there’s so much heavy machinery everywhere! One of the director’s masterstrokes was to incorporate a giant forklift exoskeleton in the final battle, making for an evenly-matched fight to the death that is surely this film’s one truly great scene (though even that titanic scrap falls some way short of the greatness of the chestburster scene in Alien).

As with Alien, masculine and corporate aggression and arrogance are punished here in a terrifyingly brutal fashion, although the two films were entirely different beasts: Cameron’s sequel is the all-guns-blazing battle royale after the slow, disconcerting build up of Ridley Scott’s original, and the action is certainly intense and frightening here, as numerous aliens scuttle along vents and under floor panels, stalking the human prey. It’s difficult to compare the two – Scott made a horror film set in space and Cameron followed it up with a war film set in space – but this latest viewing has cemented my belief that Scott’s film is superior, mainly because it came first, created many of the series’ themes and established the two major characters: the alien and Ripley. There are, of course, plenty of reasons why I’ve watched Cameron’s blistering, flame-throwing funfest so many times over the years, though. So yeah, it’s still a blast thirty years later, but I think I’ve had my fill now.

Note: This screening was for the film’s 30th anniversary so the cinema showed the original version. As everyone knows the Special Edition director’s cut is better AND shootier and that’s the version I’ve generally watched in the past.

Directed by: James Cameron.
Written by: James Cameron. Story by James Cameron, David Giler, Walter Hill.
Starring: Sigourney Weaver, Michael Biehn, Paul Reiser, Lance Henriksen, Jenette Goldstein, Carrie Henn, Bill Paxton, William Hope, Al Matthews.
Cinematography: Adrian Biddle.
Editing: Ray Lovejoy.
Music:
James Horner.
Certificate:
18.
Running Time:
137 minutes.
Year:
1986.

Comments 17

  1. Tom July 20, 2016

    A fantastic and different take on Aliens dude. I can’t say I’ve seen it anywhere near as often (I’ve sat through it once all the way through) but that’s a great point you make. Sometimes if you watch/listen/experience something so often it erodes that initial emotion you get on the first. I’m getting that way with several movies myself, though few of them are as big and recognizable as Aliens. Ridley Scott’s ‘Matchstick Men’ is one of them. I think I’ve burned a hole in that DVD actually….it’s bad

    • Stu July 21, 2016

      Ah I’ve not seen that one – is it worth a look? It completely passed me by at the time! Anyway – thanks for the kind words Tom. Aliens is great fun but I struggled to write this…it has all been said before about this film and I’m trying to write shorter pieces at the moment just to stay on top of everything.

      • Tom July 21, 2016

        Matchstick Men is fantastic I thought. It is so different from Ridley Scott’s other work you would think it’s not even him. But I loved it, and it features one of Nic Cage’s best performances (not one of those goofily over-the-top caricatures), and Sam Rockwell has never steered me wrong. Check it out man

        • Stu July 22, 2016

          I agree about Rockwell – haven’t yet seen him in anything where he has been bad. The guy is really charismatic.

        • Tom July 22, 2016

          Rockwell = rocksolid. Or, he just rocks really well. Ok, I’ll stop.

  2. ckckred July 21, 2016

    Nice review Stu. Oddly enough, despite the original being one of my favorite horror movies, I’ve never seen this film. I don’t have any good excuse (well, maybe since I wasn’t a fan of any of Cameron’s later features), so I’ll have to rectify it.

    • Stu July 21, 2016

      Cheers…and it’s definitely worth a watch! In some ways very similar to Alien (the lead, the creature, some of the sets, the production design, the costume design, etc.) but it’s definitely a case of Cameron giving the wider audience what it wanted, i.e. the first film, but with a lot more action on top. I think Scott’s is a masterpiece, and this I’d say is just short of that, but really good nonetheless and – along with The Terminator – one of the best 80’s action films.

  3. Keith July 21, 2016

    Oh man I gotta say I can watch this anytime anywhere. I too watched it a ridiculous amount of times growing up (still have the dialogue in numerous scenes in my head word-for-word). I still find myself revisiting it a couple times each year. I think it holds up sooo well. And I do still see it as one of the greatest sequels ever made. So it’s true, I’m a die-hard Aliens apologist! 😉

    • Stu July 21, 2016

      I can’t argue with any of that! I also think it holds up well (aside from one or two special effects, which I mentioned in the review) and I can only think of a few sequels that are better – big guns like Terminator 2, The Empire Strikes Back or The Godfather Pt II. I’ve seen this so many times though I think I need a decade’s break at least, or possibly even longer!

        • Stu July 21, 2016

          Those are all brilliant, and arguably better than the originals they follow, but I guess without the pressure of having to establish a premise/a world/characters. That’s why I’m often tempted to say the original is better in each case…but there are so many cases to make for those sequels being better, too. I suppose it doesn’t really matter anyway!

        • Keith July 21, 2016

          Good points. And you also have to consider that there wouldn’t be any sequels if the originals didn’t do really good jobs.

        • Stu July 21, 2016

          True! That all said…I’m still debating whether to see Now You See Me 2 or not.

  4. Mark Walker August 12, 2016

    Man, this is definitely due a revisit. Like you, I watched this A LOT throughout my teenage years. I loved it. Not sure if I’d still love it but I really don’t see why not. It’s a classic of the genre and I wouldn’t mind catching it on the big screen.

    A lot of discussion surrounds which is better; Scott’s or Cameron’s but I gotta go Cameron on this one. I liked the faster pace, I liked the characters (and actors) more and the action scenes are just sublime. So, yeah, it’s Aliens for me!

  5. Todd B September 5, 2016

    I remember walking out of the theater the first time back in ’86, and realizing I was breathing hard and gasping for air…I’d never had a film affect me that way, before or since! I still love it, after seeing it maybe a dozen times since that first time, and I think I’d go with Aliens over Alien, although I do love both, and agree with quite a few points you make about the two. And as far as the Director’s Cut goes…love the sentry guns!

    • Stu September 6, 2016

      It is a very entertaining film, and I don’t know what Cameron was doing leaving those sentry guns out of the theatrical cut! It was great to see it on the big screen after all these years, but as time passes my preference for Alien grows. (Like a small creature that is gestating inside me, worryingly.)

Get in touch...

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s